Search for: "In re: HP INKJET PRINTER LITIGATION"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2013, 11:48 am
In In re: HP Inkjet Printer Litigation, Case No. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
In re Hp Inkjet Printer Litigation, No. 05-3580 (N.D. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:59 am
In the HP Inkjet Printer litigation, the plaintiffs negotiated $1.5 million in coupons and perfunctory injunctive relief. [read post]
22 May 2013, 8:00 am
In re: HP Inkjet Printer Litigation, ___ F.3d ___ (9th Cir. 5/15/13), addresses attorney fee awards in coupon settlements under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA). [read post]
17 May 2013, 5:00 am
In In re: HP Inkjet Printer Litigation, ___ F.3d ___ (9th Cir. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 10:45 am
In re HP Inkjet Printer Litigation, 2008 WL 2949265 (N.D.Cal. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 6:18 am
See In re HP Inkjet Printer Litigation, 2011 WL 1158635 (N.D. [read post]
24 May 2013, 12:16 pm
In re HP Inkjet Printer Litigation, No. 11-16097, 2013 U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 9:00 pm
See In re HP Inkjet Printer Litig., 716 F.3d 1173 (9th Cir. 2013). [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:25 am
In the pending case of In re HP Laser Printer Litigation (a C.D. [read post]
22 May 2013, 3:26 pm
(In re HP Inkjet Printer Litigation, No. 11-16097 (9th Cir. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 3:00 am
The court observed that this view was adopted by the Ninth Circuit in In re HP Inkjet Printer Litig., 716 F.3d 1173 (9th Cir. 2013). [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
When the district court ruled, the Ninth Circuit had held in In re HP Inkjet Printer Litigation, 716 F.3d 1173 (9th Cir. 2013) that § 1712(a) and (b) are not permissive; they provide that a district court must calculate attorneys’ fees for coupon awards as a percentage of the redeemed value and must use the lodestar method to calculate fees for injunctive relief. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 5:33 am
Disagreeing with the Ninth Circuit’s decision in In Re HP Inkjet Printer Litigation, 716 F.3d 1173 (9th Cir. 2013), the Seventh Circuit concluded that attorneys’ fees could be calculated using the lodestar method in coupon settlements, while simultaneously warning district courts to use the method only after “evaluat[ing] critically the claims of success of a class receiving coupons. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
The district court observed that In re HP Inkjet Printer Litigation, 716 F.3d 1173 (9th Cir. 2013), the Ninth Circuit addressed the calculation of attorneys’ fees in the context of coupon settlement under CAFA, and held that if a settlement gives coupon and equitable relief and the district court sets attorneys’ fees based on the value of the entire settlement, and not solely on the basis of injunctive relief, then the district court must use… [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
Highlights this week included: Supreme Court re-opens door for patentability of business methods in Bilski v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
(American IPA) US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court re-opens door for patentability of business methods in Bilski v. [read post]
